Commentary/Mani Shankar Aiyar
What the Indian economy needs is not planning but perspectives
When it was the role of the State to occupy the arrow-head of
the industrial development process, it made sense to have the
kind of detailed sector-wise modeling that informed our plans
from Mahalanobis to Pranab Mukherjee. Now that we have decided
to let the private and multinational sectors take over much of
the responsibility for further industrial development, and increasingly
for infrastructure development, it makes little sense, at least
in this modernised segment of the economy, to first say that the
market will determine the direction of the economy -- and then
direct the economy to determine the direction of the market!
Yet, that is precisely what Yojana Bhavan proposes for the Ninth Plan.
Could not Gowda have found someone a little younger, a little
more with it, for the Planning Commission? This is like asking
Mozart to write the score for a Michael Jackson concert!
The focus of planning must shift from fine-tuning sectors which
-- and should -- take care of themselves to sectors which still
cry out for state intervention: agriculture, rural development
and diversification. Health, education, and, above all, the direct
assault on poverty. (Perhaps also infrastructure, at least for
just this one additional plan period, now that Manmohan has confessed
in this regard his mea culpa.)
For what the modernised segment of the Indian economy now needs
is not planning but perspectives. Any private sector manager needs
a medium-term fix on macroeconomic parameters to work out what
he should be planning for his enterprise in a micro-economic sense.
It is this perspective that Yojana Bhavan should be providing,
with frequent updates, imparting a high sense of confidence in
the figures by increasingly sophisticated computer modelling in
the Perspective Planning Division.
The key point to note here is that at any given time there will
be a five-year perspective, not a single immutable perspective
for blocks of five years, as at present. Every year -- at least
-- the Planning Commission will crunch the numbers and tell India
and the world what the coming five years will be like and, within
that framework, what the next 12 months seem set to be.
In precisely
the same way as planning inhibits the flow of private
investment, both domestic and foreign, perspective planning of
the kind suggested would do more for stimulating investment than
any number of glossy come-hither pamphlets put out by either Chidambaram's
outfit or Gujral's.
That will leave the rest of the Planning Commission free to concentrate
on what it really should be doing -- improving the government's
capacity to govern in areas crying out for improved governance
-- which is the area roughly covered by the 700 million Indians
who are outside the marketplace.
For the 200 million who are within, let the market take care of
their needs -- the State has only to set up the goal-posts and
level the playing field. But, for the rest -- the vast majority,
their crippling disadvantage has been the State's inability to
deliver to them their due.
We have now taken the first giant step
towards securing for the poor a development delivery machinery
which is in their own control: assured Panchayati Raj. What we
have in place, however, is but the shell. The substance is yet
to be poured in. No institution is better-positioned than the
Planning Commission to micro-monitor the implementation of Panchayati
Raj.
Poverty and hopelessly inadequate human resources development
are the root causes of our failings. Both have been gravely aggravated
by the almost total reliance on a bureaucratic machinery for the
delivery of development. Development can come only through democracy
at the grass roots. A Ninth Plan Approach which translates into
the actual practices of governance; the provisions of the panchayats
and nagarpalikas Constitutional amendments will do more for real
growth rates than any number of computer simulations in Yojana
Bhavan. For, hitherto, planning has been about capturing the commanding
heights of the economy. It should now be about capturing the commanding
heights of the polity.
|