Commentary/Mani Shankar Aiyar
What the country needs is not a common minimum programme
but an uncommon maximum programme
The second option is of letting in a Congress prime minister.
Given the party composition of the present Lok Sabha, the option
is not practical politics without the CPI-M either becoming part
of a Congress-led coalition or, at the very least, supporting
such a minority government from without.
I can appreciate our
comrades gagging at the prospect. But the Congress is not a hilsa
bone caught in the throat, and running the country in the 50th
year of its Independence is not a dinner party. If there is a
tithe of national responsibility in the CPI-M, there is no alternative
to their facing up to this prospect, however much they might gag
on it.
For even if the CPI-M does gag and we head for the third
option -- elections -- it would take a foolish prophet indeed
to foresee an outcome in which any one party comes out with a
majority on its own. Elections over, we would be back to the national
duty of preventing a Hindutva takeover.
Short of the Congress
winning an outright majority, the only way of forestalling a BJP
government is for the non-BJP parties to get their act together.
We have done it one way since May 1996 -- and Jyoti Basu has correctly
characterised that way as a blunder. Is there another way of doing
it -- either within the lifetime of the current Lok Sabha or,
post-elections, when the next Lok Sabha is convened?
Yes, there is -- provided the Left reassesses its relationship
to the Congress in the new political dispensation that is taking
us into the 21st century, the Era of Coalitions. Fact One is that
the Communist-Congress relationship is asymmetrical -- the Congress
is unacceptable to the Left, but the Left is not unacceptable
to the Congress. The burden of adjustment, therefore, falls
on the Left.
This country is not a conglomerate of regions; it is Union in
which the Union precedes the states -- and the states are a creation
of the Union. Regional parties are fine for the region; only national
parties can keep the nation together and give it a national perspective
and a national vision. Without the nation as something more --
much more -- than the lowest common denominator of the states,
meaningful governance is not possible.
What the country needs
is not a common minimum programme but an uncommon maximum programme.
Such a programme can only be given by a party or parties who view
the country from Kashmir to Kanyakumari and not from Gudiyattam
to Colachel.
As of now, there are only three national parties
-- the Congress, which still has a presence every where, even
if it be a diminishing presence, the BJP, which has a presence
in many places, even if that falls well short of everywhere; and
the Communists, who are, in terms of political reality, a regional
party of the east and far south-west but who, in terms of ideology
and outlook, can fairly claim to be national party.
It is only
one of these parties, on its own, or a combination of two or more
of them that can give this nation a national government.
There was a time not so long ago when the Communists helped Indira
Gandhi stop the country from falling into the clutches of bunch
of feudals backed by a bunch of capitalists. That is the kind
of language which it is no longer fashionable to use -- but it
is the truth. Following the Congress split of 1969, the Communists
helped Indira expose the Grand Alliance both before and after
the crucial elections of 1971. Without being part of government,
the Communists thus contributed to setting the tone for both our
polity and our economy in the seventies and eighties.
The re-establishment of a Congress-Communist axis is feared in
certain circles precisely because a return to the seventies and
eighties is what is feared.
It is a baseless fear. For there can be no return -- for anyone
-- to what is past. We can only go forward. And what the Communists
have to ask themselves is whether they want to be part of India
2000 or not. With the Congress, they can be. Without the Congress,
they will remain a voice-off.
|