HOME | SPORTS | NEWS |
November 4, 1999
NEWS
|
Tendulkar's decision dubious - Yet in elite companyMohandas MenonThe Law 13 (1) states: In a two innings match the side which bats first and leads by 200 runs in a match of five days or more, by 150 runs in a three-day or four-day match, by 100 runs in a two-day match, or by 75 runs in a one-day match, shall have option of requiring the other side to follow their innings.
This Law which first appeared in 1835 was perhaps the
most controversial of the Cricket Laws. Initially it
was compulsory for a team to enforce the follow-on if
the lead was over 100 runs.
It was not until 1900 that the law was altered to make follow-on optional. At the same time the margin was increased to 150 runs in a three-day match. From 1963 it was decided to experiment with a follow-on of 200 runs for a match of five days or more. This became the Law in 1971. In fact the first captain to enforce a follow-on in Tests was England's Lord Harris against Australia at the Oval, in 1880, which incidentally was the first ever Test to be played in England. There have been several instances in Test cricket when the captain did not enforce the follow-on for various reasons. However in most cases his decision not to do so has ultimately resulted in victory. However in the last 30 odd years only three Test captains could not force a victory after not enforcing the follow-on. Sachin Tendulkar unfortunately became the third such captain. He however can draw some solace from the fact that he joins England's Ray Illingworth and West Indian Gary Sobers in this dubious club of captains. Illingworth did not enforce the follow-on despite a lead of 235 runs against Australia at Adelaide in February, 1971. He set his opponents a target of 469 runs in 500 minutes. Australia managed to draw the match scoring 328-3 at stumps on the last day. A year later, West Indies captain Gary Sobers against New Zealand at Port of Spain in April, 1972 did not make his opponents bat again despite a first innings lead of 206 runs. He eventually left New Zealand 605 minutes in which to score 401 runs. The visitors finally managed to score 253 for seven wickets thanks New Zealand's eight wicket pair of Ken Wadsworth and Bruce Taylor who batted out the last 106 minutes to earn a draw. The list below provides the names of the captains who did not enforce the follow-on despite having a chance to do so. Interestingly in the last decade, other than Tendulkar, Australian Mark Taylor and South African Hansie Cronje were the only to do so. Needless to mention Taylor and Cronje led their teams to victory. Incidentally. India's lead of 275 at Ahmedabad was the second highest by a team not enforcing a follow-on.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mail Sports Editor
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
HOME |
NEWS |
ELECTION 99 |
BUSINESS |
SPORTS |
MOVIES |
CHAT |
INFOTECH |
TRAVEL SINGLES | BOOK SHOP | MUSIC SHOP | HOTEL RESERVATIONS | MONEY EDUCATION | PERSONAL HOMEPAGES | FREE EMAIL | FEEDBACK |