![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
HOME | BUSINESS | REPORT |
May 8, 2000
BUDGET 2000 |
CII stance on Maruti sparks fresh privatisation debateNeena Haridas in New Delhi
Will Maruti Udyog Limited, or MUL, be put on the block? Will Suzuki Motor Corporation buy the government out in the joint venture? Will the Japanese rewrite Indian automobile history yet again?
The CII recently said that the government should sell its stake in Maruti to a private player. "The government has no business to be in a highly competitive manufacturing industry. The chamber would be taking up this issue with the policy-makers, the divestment ministry, and the trade unions. These meetings would also chalk out the time-frame and extent of equity to be divested in MUL as also in other public sector undertakings. "We will be working closely with the government and trade unions to identify the companies that need to be privatised. Though we are yet to finalise the list, I feel even Maruti should be put on the sell-off list," Arun Bharat Ram had said.
MUL is a 50:50 joint venture between the Indian government and the Japanese auto giant Suzuki. MUL has so far maintained its dominance in the Indian car market, selling the highest number of cars despite tough competition from Korean chaebols Daewoo Motors, Hyundai Motors and even the true-blue Tata Engineering. "Of course, privatisation will save MUL from a lot of government intervention. But I think there is a time for everything. After all, the company is doing well at the moment and even giving a run for their money to global auto giants. However, when competition increases and more foreign car manufacturers enter India, the government will have to take some tough decisions to keep pace with the changing scenario," says Murad Ali Baig, an auto expert. Explains Pradeep Shrivastav, chief economist, National Council for Applied Economic Research, "India needs to move quickly on its privatisation policy. It doesn't make sense for the government to be in a highly competitive market because it cannot take certain decisions that the private sector can. Which is why many of the public sector units are running into losses worth billions of rupees. "First of all, industry chambers, policy-makers, economists, trade unions must all come on a common platform and explain the advantages, disadvantages and implications of privitisation to each other. Privatisation does not mean calling a private player and asking him to take charge. It has to be done with a human face." The employee union at MUL, however, refuses to comment on the industry chamber's call for selling off the auto giant. However, an MUL employee says, "These things have not been discussed with us. So we are not in a position to speak on the issue. However, I am sure whatever is done will be done keeping the people in mind."
Recently, Osamu Suzuki, president and chief executive officer, SMC, while commenting on talks of alliance between General Motors and SMC, Suzuki had said that negotiations are on between the two companies but they do not include the Indian market.
|
Tell us what you think of this report | |
HOME |
NEWS |
BUSINESS |
MONEY |
SPORTS |
MOVIES |
CHAT |
INFOTECH |
TRAVEL SINGLES | NEWSLINKS | BOOK SHOP | MUSIC SHOP | GIFT SHOP | HOTEL BOOKINGS AIR/RAIL | WEATHER | MILLENNIUM | BROADBAND | E-CARDS | EDUCATION HOMEPAGES | FREE EMAIL | CONTESTS | FEEDBACK |