HOME   
   NEWS   
   BUSINESS   
   CRICKET   
   SPORTS   
   MOVIES   
   NET GUIDE   
   SHOPPING   
   BLOGS  
   ASTROLOGY  
   MATCHMAKER  


Search:



The Web

Rediff








Business
Portfolio Tracker
Business News
Specials
Columns
Market Report
Mutual Funds
Interviews
Tutorials
Message Board
Stock Talk
Press Releases



Home > Business > Business Headline > Report

IRDA chief picks holes in pension game plan

P V Vasanta Kumar in Hyderabad | May 24, 2003 13:00 IST

Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority Chairman N Rangachary on Friday objected to the government's proposal to invite separate joint ventures or subsidiaries to enter pension business.

He was responding to reports that insurers will not be allowed to enter the pension funds sector on their own and entry will be permitted only via subsidiaries or joint ventures.

The IRDA chairman said it will create a conflict of interest if two regulators are going to monitor the action -- IRDA for payouts and the proposed Pensions Regulatory and Development Authority for contributions to pension schemes.

In developed countries except in Singapore, there is a single regulator for both life and pension, Rangachary said.

In India, only a life insurance company can offer an annuity, he said. "When you talk of pension, which is nothing but an annuity, insurance companies are better equipped to collect funds, accumulate them, invest them and pay out at designated dates.

Running a pension business involves a long time-span and requires investment expertise. The life companies proved that they have both," Rangachary said.

The pension companies need to revaluate their liabilities from time to time, match the liability and take into account the investment income, be in a position to reward their investors well, he said.

Because of the long time period involved, the new companies might find it difficult to match their investments and liabilities.

In addition to this, investors of these policies will not be content with less than average returns while the average real returns will be lower because of the various imponderables like investment norms laid down by the new authority, he said.

"If you are going to have a pension fund manager within a life company, it severely restricts his activity to accumulation, gives him enough time to invest in a manner which will enhance the return on investment.

He can invest the money in as risky an investment as the customer wants, or he can go for a whole government bonds investment or a combination.

So what will happen is you can convert these investments into a larger principal than what you get in an insurance policy. The larger the principal sum is, the larger will be the pension," he said.

"There are charges that life companies do not know how to manage their funds and they do not have investment expertise But, I would like to ask which company had as much investment as the LIC has.

All these asset management companies put together do not have even 10 per cent of the LIC's corpus, which is at Rs 2,40,000 crore (Rs 2,400 billion) and the corporation invests about Rs 30,000 crore (Rs 300 billion) afresh every year in the market," he said.


Powered by



Article Tools

Email this Article

Printer-Friendly Format

Letter to the Editor



Related Stories


Can private insurers overtake

SBI Life takes lead in pension

IRDA seeks more penal powers



People Who Read This Also Read


PM unveils hydro power initiative

Volumes can nullify Re rise impact

Rupee rise seen hitting IT margins







HOME   
   NEWS   
   BUSINESS   
   CRICKET   
   SPORTS   
   MOVIES   
   NET GUIDE   
   SHOPPING   
   BLOGS  
   ASTROLOGY  
   MATCHMAKER  
© 2003 rediff.com India Limited. All Rights Reserved.